How you think
Not the payload. The reasoning that got you to it, what you ruled out on the way and the moment you decided the thing in front of you could be pushed further.
No degree. No CV screening. One piece of work.
Before you start: do not test this site. Read the rules of engagement.
Register as an offensive security researcher. Six questions: handle, specialities, one piece of work, availability and contact.
See what we readWe open the link before we read the rest. A finding, a tool, a write-up, a research note nobody asked you to publish. It does not have to be famous. It has to be yours and it has to show how you think.
Not the payload. The reasoning that got you to it, what you ruled out on the way and the moment you decided the thing in front of you could be pushed further.
A finding nobody can reproduce is a story. We look for steps, evidence and an honest account of impact, including the times it turned out to be smaller than it looked.
You will explain what you found to people who are not you, sometimes to people who will have to defend the budget to fix it. Clear beats clever, every time.
No degree is required and none is an advantage. Self-taught, dropped out, still studying, switching careers at forty: none of that is a question on this form, because none of it predicts what you can find.
This is our production infrastructure. It holds other people's data: companies that told us what they are afraid of, and researchers who sent us their work and their contact details. It is not a target and it is not a CTF.
Testing something you were not authorized to test is the one thing that closes an application here. We do this for a living: an unrequested scan is unmistakable in the logs, and it does not read as talent. It reads as someone who has not yet learned the part of the job that keeps clients.
Tell us, and stop there. Do not go deeper to measure the impact, do not pull data to prove it, do not check whether it works twice. Our disclosure contact is in security.txt.
We do not run a bug bounty and we do not pay for reports. We read every one, we answer, and we credit you publicly if you want the credit. Reporting well is itself a piece of work we can evaluate.
Everything you want to prove, prove it where you were allowed to: your own lab, a CTF, a program that authorized you, a tool you wrote, a target that said yes in writing. That is what the form below is for.
Keep it. It identifies your registration without us having to ask for your personal details again.
Not a filter, not a keyword scan, not a model. Someone who does this work opens your link and reads it.
If it is a no, you get a no. Silence is what the companies we were rejected by did to us, and we are not going to reproduce it.
A conversation about how you work, then a real engagement with an agreed scope, written authorization and someone alongside you the first time.
We were turned down for the wrong reasons.Register
We are not going to turn you down for them.